This article has been reviewed by the following Topic Editor: Stephen C. Nodvin
Knowledge gaps and research needs
Old-growth ponderosa pine in Winema National Forest in south-central Oregon on the dry eastern slopes of the Cascade Mountain Range. (Source: K. Norman Johnson)
There have been few scientific studies of older forests outside the Pacific Northwest, and there is still much to learn even in that region. Early notions held that older forests were “decadent” and produced little of human value. It was considered good management to replace them as quickly as possible with young, “vigorous” forests. Now that pioneering research has shown that older forests have important roles to play in biodiversity, aesthetics, and carbon sequestration, as well as serving as spiritual exemplars of the majesty of nature, it’s time to examine them in detail from the perspectives of all who benefit from them. We need to know more about their physiological and ecological processes and their interactions with humans. We need to know how to conserve the entire forest cycle that produces and maintains older forests. We need to know what kinds and levels of disturbance by human and natural sources older forests need and can tolerate. The most urgent research need is to get a better picture of the state and quantity of older forests in each region. The next most urgent task is to produce integrated management protocols to ameliorate the threats to older forests and to insure their continuity on the landscape.
The National Commission on Science for Sustainable Forestry (NCSSF) is a results oriented program that has a mandate to provide practical information and approaches that serve the needs of forest managers, practitioners and policymakers. The program’s mission is to improve the scientific basis for the development, implementation, and evaluation of sustainable forestry in the United States. NCSSF is currently focused on Criteria 1 of the Montreal Process: Conservation of biological diversity. ... (Full Bio)
Knowledge gaps and research needs
Old-growth ponderosa pine in Winema National Forest in south-central Oregon on the dry eastern slopes of the Cascade Mountain Range. (Source: K. Norman Johnson)
There have been few scientific studies of older forests outside the Pacific Northwest, and there is still much to learn even in that region. Early notions held that older forests were “decadent” and produced little of human value. It was considered good management to replace them as quickly as possible with young, “vigorous” forests. Now that pioneering research has shown that older forests have important roles to play in biodiversity, aesthetics, and carbon sequestration, as well as serving as spiritual exemplars of the majesty of nature, it’s time to examine them in detail from the perspectives of all who benefit from them. We need to know more about their physiological and ecological processes and their interactions with humans. We need to know how to conserve the entire forest cycle that produces and maintains older forests. We need to know what kinds and levels of disturbance by human and natural sources older forests need and can tolerate. The most urgent research need is to get a better picture of the state and quantity of older forests in each region. The next most urgent task is to produce integrated management protocols to ameliorate the threats to older forests and to insure their continuity on the landscape.
Comments
There are no comments.