Climate Change and Foreign Policy: Appendix
Published: July 3, 2007, 7:58 pm
Updated: July 7, 2012, 4:16 pm
This article has been reviewed by the following Topic Editor:
Cutler J. Cleveland
Appendix: Climate Change at the Multilateral Level
A number of processes at the multilateral level offer opportunities to implement strategies to allow developed and developing countries to engage in dialogue and take action on climate change.
UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol
The UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol are the most recognized and advanced elements of the response to climate change. The development of a more effective and inclusive approach to addressing climate change in post-2012 was given a considerable boost with the launch of a two-track process initiated under the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (COP-11/MOP-1) held in Montreal in November/December 2005. These discussions are taking place under Protocol Article 3.9 on future commitments, and under the Convention through a Dialogue on Long-term Cooperative Action. It is clear that negotiations on future commitments will be difficult, and that a “one size fits all,” Kyoto type, absolute target approach to future commitments is not likely to meet the support of major emitters of GHG (e.g., the U.S., China and India).
The first meetings under the two-track approach took place in Bonn, Germany in May 2006. The Dialogue considered advancing development goals in a sustainable way; addressing action on adaptation; and realizing the full potential of technology and market-based opportunities. The meeting, the first of up to four workshops, had no binding or negotiated outcome, although a co-facilitators’ report will be produced[1]. The Ad Hoc Working Group (AWG) agreed to a future work plan to set new targets beyond 2012. The UNFCCC report of the working group meeting noted that the Group’s discussion will focus on the consideration of further commitments by Annex I parties, and that the AWG should aim to complete its work on time to ensure no gap between the first and the second commitment periods (although no timetable was determined for decisions on the level of reductions). The AWG will hold its second session at COP/MOP 2 where its future work plan will be elaborated[2].
The UN System
A number of programs within the UN system play an important role in the achievement of climate change objectives, including the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and its main implementing agencies: the UNDP, UNEP and World Bank. Climate change is also addressed by such agencies as the World Health Organization, World Meteorological Organization, UN Industrial Development Organization and the UN Institute for Training and Research.
The Commission for Sustainable Development (CSD) has taken on a more substantive role in addressing climate by reviewing progress toward the outcomes of Agenda 21 and the Johannesburg Plan of Action with respect to, inter alia, energy for sustainable development and climate change. The CSD offers an additional venue in which to develop an understanding of different perspectives and concerns on these critical issues, particularly in regard to developing countries.
The G8 and the Gleneagles Plan of Action
In 2005, the G8 leaders agreed to a communiqué that included a political statement, action plan and a future Dialogue on Climate Change, Clean Energy and Sustainable Development[3]. G8 leaders agreed to work with the IEA to conduct research in priority areas for moving forward on climate change, and with the World Bank to investigate options for financing the transition to a low emissions future economy. The Gleneagles Ministerial Dialogue will continue in Mexico in October 2006, and will report on the process at the Japanese Summit in 2008. Global energy security was a central focus of the July 2006 St. Petersburg Summit, where the action plan committed to enhancing energy security through actions in key areas, including addressing climate change and sustainable development[4].
While the G8 is not an official negotiating forum, it does play a significant role in building consensus and momentum on the path towards a post-2012 climate policy regime. The participation of Brazil, China, India, South Africa and Mexico (G8+5) in Gleneagles and Petersburg represented a broadening of participation and a wider spectrum of the global economy, providing an opportunity for the engagement of the major emitter countries in GHG emissions reduction.
The World Bank
The World Bank is developing an Investment Framework for Clean Energy and Development in the context of the Gleneagles Communiqué. A discussion paper outlining the framework was discussed at the spring 2006 meetings of the Development Committee, and a revised paper will be considered at the joint annual meeting of the World Bank and IMF in Singapore in September 2006. The framework aims to identify investment and financing policy actions to help further the goal of the UNFCCC, and assist developing countries in meeting energy demands for economic growth and poverty alleviation in an environmentally sustainable manner.
The OECD and IEA
In the area of climate change, the OECD’s goal is to help member countries achieve climate change goals in an environmentally effective and economically-efficient manner. Recently, the OECD decided to strengthen its work on the linkages between adaptation to climate change and international development cooperation. At a meeting of OECD development and environment ministers in April 2006, the ministers agreed to a joint Declaration on Integrating Climate Change Adaptation into Development Cooperation, including a decision to develop OECD guidance on integrating adaptation into development activities[5].
The IEA provides policy advice to its 26 member countries to support their efforts to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy. Its work involves climate change policy and energy technology collaboration, including the Climate Technology Initiative. The OECD and the IEA host the Annex I Expert Group to the UNFCCC, which includes consultations with developing country experts to discuss issues of mutual interest on the international climate change agenda.
The memberships of the OECD and the IEA, which are predominantly Annex 1 countries, collectively represent enormous economic weight. The organizations are well positioned to make significant contributions to the development of a post-2012 regime through discussions amongst members and consultations with developing countries.
The Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate
In 2005, Australia, China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the United States announced the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (AP-6). The purpose of the partnership is to develop and deploy low-emissions technologies, not to set emissions reduction targets[6]. The AP-6, described as a model for public-private collaboration, is intended to complement the Kyoto Protocol and to maintain the key principles of the UNFCCC[7]. An inaugural Ministerial meeting was held in Sydney, Australia in January 2006. The first Task Force working meetings were held in the United States in April 2006 to develop action plans to encourage deployment of clean technology in eight areas: cleaner fossil energy; renewable energy and distributed generation; power generation and transmission; steel; aluminum; cement; coal mining; and buildings and appliances.
As the AP-6 is relatively new, it is difficult to assess its achievements or failures. If successful, AP-6 could greatly influence the global process for future climate change mitigation due to its geopolitical representation and technical and economic capacity. In particular two unique features, the partnership role of industry in the AP-6 framework and the sectoral approach in addressing greenhouse gas emissions, could be extremely useful in developing a post-2012 regime that more effectively reflects the complexity of actors involved in delivering on greenhouse gas emission commitments. As well, the AP-6 could offer lessons on the critical issues of technology transfer and international technology cooperation. Other countries, such as Canada, Mexico and Russia, have expressed interest in joining the partnership.
Notes
-
^International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2006. Summary of the UNFCCC Dialogue on Long-Term Cooperative Action: May 15–16, 2006. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. Vol.12, No.297. May 17, 2006. Winnipeg: IISD.
-
^UNFCCC, 2006. Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Bonn May 17–25, 2006. (FCCC/KP/AWG/2006/2, July 18). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
-
^G8, 2005. G8 Gleneagles 2005. Policy Issues: Climate Change. Group of Eight.
-
^G8, 2006. Global Energy Security. Group of Eight.
-
^OECD, 2006. Declaration on Integrating Climate Change Adaptation into Development Cooperation: Adopted by Environment and Development Ministers of OECD Member Countries on April 4, 2006. Paris: OECD. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
-
^Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2006. Charter: Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate.
-
^US Department of State, 2006. Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. Media note, May 1. US Department of State.
This is a chapter from Climate Change and Foreign Policy: An exploration of options for greater integration (e-book).
Previous: Recommendations | Table of Contents | Next: none
|
Are you absolutely sure you want to delete this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Delete This Article
Are you absolutely sure you want to remove this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Remove This Article
Citation
International Institute for Sustainable Development, Beverley Darkin, Richard Tarasofsky, John Van Ham, Jo-Ellen Parry, Peter Dickey, Aaron Cosbey, Oli Brown, Deborah Murphy, John Drexhage (Lead Author);Cutler J. Cleveland (Topic Editor) "Climate Change and Foreign Policy: Appendix". In: Encyclopedia of Earth. Eds. Cutler J. Cleveland (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment). [First published in the Encyclopedia of Earth July 3, 2007; Last revised Date July 7, 2012; Retrieved May 24, 2013 <http://www.eoearth.org/article/Climate_Change_and_Foreign_Policy:_Appendix>
The Authors
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a Canadian-based not-for-profit organization whose mission is to promote change towards sustainable development. As of 2007, IISD employed 150 people located in more than 30 countries, and partnered with more than 200 organizations throughout the world. Is efforts are focused on research, commentary, communication and outreach on a range of topics related to sustainable development. Principal areas of focus include Climate Chan ... (Full Bio)
Beverley Darkin is a Senior Research Fellow in the Energy, Environment and Development Program at Chatham House. Expertise International climate change policy and politics, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto Protocol and G8 negotiationsUK and EU climate policy, particularly governance/institutional issuesEU-China energy and climate securityClimate change, foreign policy and securityProjects EU-China interdependencies on energy and climate security (forthco ... (Full Bio)
Richard G. Tarasofsky, a Senior Policy Adviser of Ecologic, was chosen to head the research program on Sustainable Development of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) as of the beginning of 2004. He is an international lawyer specializing in all aspects of environment and sustainable development law. Recently, he led or worked on projects on trade, biodiversity, forests, fisheries, and EU environmental law. Among his portfolio of projects are: Consumer Protection and International ... (Full Bio)
John has 12 years of experience in the energy and mining industries, at the corporate level in strategy development, policy formulation, and planning, and at the operations level in project development, implementation, and management. John has successfully led a range of projects through all stages, from project ideation and development to completion. He continually demonstrates his ability to achieve results in challenging situations. His logical and analytically rigorous approach ensures thoro ... (Full Bio)
Within IISD's Climate Change and Energy Program, Jo-Ellen Parry utilizes her broad knowledge of climate change, natural resource management and community development in her various roles as researcher, project manager, network coordinator and program manager. Her recent research and project management work has focused on the intersection of developing countries, adaptation to the effects of climate change, and establishment of a post-2012 climate regime. She has also explored how the clean d ... (Full Bio)
Peter Dickey is the President of P.S. Dickey Consultants Ltd., established in 1994, and is also an associate of the International Institute of Sustainable Development (IISD). Dickey graduated from Queen's University in 1966 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. From 1966 to 1994, Dickey worked for Shell Canada in a number of engineering positions involving refinery and oilsands facilities design, operations and maintenance. He also coordinated the company’s energy co ... (Full Bio)
Aaron Cosbey is an environmental economist specializing in the areas of trade and sustainable development, international environmental governance, and climate change. He works on two of IISD's program areas: trade and investment, where he serves as Associate and Senior Adviser, and climate change and energy, where he serves as Associate. He is a Member of International Trade Canada's Market Access Advisory Group, past Member of the Deputy Minister for International Trade's Academic A ... (Full Bio)
Oli Brown is a project manager and policy researcher for IISD's Trade and Investment, and Security programs. He also co-ordinates the Trade, Aid and Security initiative – a joint IISD/IUCN project that focuses on the way in which the trade in natural resources can contribute to violent conflict, and on the role of development assistance and trade liberalization in fueling or alleviating this downward spiral. With a first degree in Social Anthropology and a Masters in International Relation ... (Full Bio)
Deborah Murphy has more than fifteen years in the international development field. She specializes in the areas of climate change, technology transfer and project management; and has worked extensively on environmental capacity building projects in India and China. She is an Associate of IISD’s Climate Change and Energy Program, and Senior Associate at Resource Futures International, Ottawa. Prior to working as an environmental consultant, Ms. Murphy was a Senior Policy Advisor with the Enviro ... (Full Bio)
John Drexhage is Director of IISD's Climate Change and Energy Program. With a team of 15 staff and associates across Canada and overseas, Mr. Drexhage’s work on climate change is based on 12 years of experience on the issue, first as a domestic adviser and international negotiator on climate change and then as an expert analyst and manager for IISD. Drexhage’s expertise covers a broad range of areas related to climate change, and he is currently focusing on regulatory frameworks for gree ... (Full Bio)

Appendix: Climate Change at the Multilateral Level
A number of processes at the multilateral level offer opportunities to implement strategies to allow developed and developing countries to engage in dialogue and take action on climate change.
UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol
The UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol are the most recognized and advanced elements of the response to climate change. The development of a more effective and inclusive approach to addressing climate change in post-2012 was given a considerable boost with the launch of a two-track process initiated under the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (COP-11/MOP-1) held in Montreal in November/December 2005. These discussions are taking place under Protocol Article 3.9 on future commitments, and under the Convention through a Dialogue on Long-term Cooperative Action. It is clear that negotiations on future commitments will be difficult, and that a “one size fits all,” Kyoto type, absolute target approach to future commitments is not likely to meet the support of major emitters of GHG (e.g., the U.S., China and India).
The first meetings under the two-track approach took place in Bonn, Germany in May 2006. The Dialogue considered advancing development goals in a sustainable way; addressing action on adaptation; and realizing the full potential of technology and market-based opportunities. The meeting, the first of up to four workshops, had no binding or negotiated outcome, although a co-facilitators’ report will be produced[1]. The Ad Hoc Working Group (AWG) agreed to a future work plan to set new targets beyond 2012. The UNFCCC report of the working group meeting noted that the Group’s discussion will focus on the consideration of further commitments by Annex I parties, and that the AWG should aim to complete its work on time to ensure no gap between the first and the second commitment periods (although no timetable was determined for decisions on the level of reductions). The AWG will hold its second session at COP/MOP 2 where its future work plan will be elaborated[2].
The UN System
A number of programs within the UN system play an important role in the achievement of climate change objectives, including the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and its main implementing agencies: the UNDP, UNEP and World Bank. Climate change is also addressed by such agencies as the World Health Organization, World Meteorological Organization, UN Industrial Development Organization and the UN Institute for Training and Research.
The Commission for Sustainable Development (CSD) has taken on a more substantive role in addressing climate by reviewing progress toward the outcomes of Agenda 21 and the Johannesburg Plan of Action with respect to, inter alia, energy for sustainable development and climate change. The CSD offers an additional venue in which to develop an understanding of different perspectives and concerns on these critical issues, particularly in regard to developing countries.
The G8 and the Gleneagles Plan of Action
In 2005, the G8 leaders agreed to a communiqué that included a political statement, action plan and a future Dialogue on Climate Change, Clean Energy and Sustainable Development[3]. G8 leaders agreed to work with the IEA to conduct research in priority areas for moving forward on climate change, and with the World Bank to investigate options for financing the transition to a low emissions future economy. The Gleneagles Ministerial Dialogue will continue in Mexico in October 2006, and will report on the process at the Japanese Summit in 2008. Global energy security was a central focus of the July 2006 St. Petersburg Summit, where the action plan committed to enhancing energy security through actions in key areas, including addressing climate change and sustainable development[4].
While the G8 is not an official negotiating forum, it does play a significant role in building consensus and momentum on the path towards a post-2012 climate policy regime. The participation of Brazil, China, India, South Africa and Mexico (G8+5) in Gleneagles and Petersburg represented a broadening of participation and a wider spectrum of the global economy, providing an opportunity for the engagement of the major emitter countries in GHG emissions reduction.
The World Bank
The World Bank is developing an Investment Framework for Clean Energy and Development in the context of the Gleneagles Communiqué. A discussion paper outlining the framework was discussed at the spring 2006 meetings of the Development Committee, and a revised paper will be considered at the joint annual meeting of the World Bank and IMF in Singapore in September 2006. The framework aims to identify investment and financing policy actions to help further the goal of the UNFCCC, and assist developing countries in meeting energy demands for economic growth and poverty alleviation in an environmentally sustainable manner.
The OECD and IEA
In the area of climate change, the OECD’s goal is to help member countries achieve climate change goals in an environmentally effective and economically-efficient manner. Recently, the OECD decided to strengthen its work on the linkages between adaptation to climate change and international development cooperation. At a meeting of OECD development and environment ministers in April 2006, the ministers agreed to a joint Declaration on Integrating Climate Change Adaptation into Development Cooperation, including a decision to develop OECD guidance on integrating adaptation into development activities[5].
The IEA provides policy advice to its 26 member countries to support their efforts to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy. Its work involves climate change policy and energy technology collaboration, including the Climate Technology Initiative. The OECD and the IEA host the Annex I Expert Group to the UNFCCC, which includes consultations with developing country experts to discuss issues of mutual interest on the international climate change agenda.
The memberships of the OECD and the IEA, which are predominantly Annex 1 countries, collectively represent enormous economic weight. The organizations are well positioned to make significant contributions to the development of a post-2012 regime through discussions amongst members and consultations with developing countries.
The Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate
In 2005, Australia, China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the United States announced the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (AP-6). The purpose of the partnership is to develop and deploy low-emissions technologies, not to set emissions reduction targets[6]. The AP-6, described as a model for public-private collaboration, is intended to complement the Kyoto Protocol and to maintain the key principles of the UNFCCC[7]. An inaugural Ministerial meeting was held in Sydney, Australia in January 2006. The first Task Force working meetings were held in the United States in April 2006 to develop action plans to encourage deployment of clean technology in eight areas: cleaner fossil energy; renewable energy and distributed generation; power generation and transmission; steel; aluminum; cement; coal mining; and buildings and appliances.
As the AP-6 is relatively new, it is difficult to assess its achievements or failures. If successful, AP-6 could greatly influence the global process for future climate change mitigation due to its geopolitical representation and technical and economic capacity. In particular two unique features, the partnership role of industry in the AP-6 framework and the sectoral approach in addressing greenhouse gas emissions, could be extremely useful in developing a post-2012 regime that more effectively reflects the complexity of actors involved in delivering on greenhouse gas emission commitments. As well, the AP-6 could offer lessons on the critical issues of technology transfer and international technology cooperation. Other countries, such as Canada, Mexico and Russia, have expressed interest in joining the partnership.
Notes
-
^International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2006. Summary of the UNFCCC Dialogue on Long-Term Cooperative Action: May 15–16, 2006. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. Vol.12, No.297. May 17, 2006. Winnipeg: IISD.
-
^UNFCCC, 2006. Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Bonn May 17–25, 2006. (FCCC/KP/AWG/2006/2, July 18). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
-
^G8, 2005. G8 Gleneagles 2005. Policy Issues: Climate Change. Group of Eight.
-
^G8, 2006. Global Energy Security. Group of Eight.
-
^OECD, 2006. Declaration on Integrating Climate Change Adaptation into Development Cooperation: Adopted by Environment and Development Ministers of OECD Member Countries on April 4, 2006. Paris: OECD. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
-
^Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2006. Charter: Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate.
-
^US Department of State, 2006. Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. Media note, May 1. US Department of State.
This is a chapter from Climate Change and Foreign Policy: An exploration of options for greater integration (e-book).
Previous: Recommendations | Table of Contents | Next: none
|
Are you absolutely sure you want to delete this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Delete This Article
Are you absolutely sure you want to remove this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Remove This Article
0 Comments
Add Comment