This article has been reviewed by the following Topic Editor: Peter Saundry
This is Section 16.1 of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Lead Author: Arne Instanes; Contributing Authors: Oleg Anisimov, Lawson Brigham, Douglas Goering, Lev N. Khrustalev, Branko Ladanyi, Jan Otto Larsen; Consulting Authors: Orson Smith, Amy Stevermer, Betsy Weatherhead, Gunter Weller
There are increased concerns related to the impact of projected climate change on arctic infrastructure, particularly how future climate change may:
increase the environmental stresses structures are exposed to, particularly in comparison to design specifications, and cause increased risk and damage to infrastructure and threat to human lives;
affect geohazards and the impacts of extreme events;
affect natural resource development scenarios in the Arctic; and
affect socioeconomic development in the Arctic.
Fig. 16.1. Flow diagram of chapter structure and questions to be answered.
Figure 16.1 presents a flow diagram of the questions that need to be answered in order to complete an impact study. Relevant information from indigenous peoples on infrastructure is given in Chapter 3.
International Arctic Science Committee was established in 1990, began operations in 1991 and today comprises 18 member countries. The IASC member organizations are national science organizations covering all fields of Arctic research. Each national member organization has a mechanism to provide ongoing contact between its IASC council member and its Arctic science community.
IASC draws on this structure to identify scientific priorities, members of working groups, etc. An international science ... (Full Bio)
This is Section 16.1 of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Lead Author: Arne Instanes; Contributing Authors: Oleg Anisimov, Lawson Brigham, Douglas Goering, Lev N. Khrustalev, Branko Ladanyi, Jan Otto Larsen; Consulting Authors: Orson Smith, Amy Stevermer, Betsy Weatherhead, Gunter Weller
There are increased concerns related to the impact of projected climate change on arctic infrastructure, particularly how future climate change may:
increase the environmental stresses structures are exposed to, particularly in comparison to design specifications, and cause increased risk and damage to infrastructure and threat to human lives;
affect geohazards and the impacts of extreme events;
affect natural resource development scenarios in the Arctic; and
affect socioeconomic development in the Arctic.
Fig. 16.1. Flow diagram of chapter structure and questions to be answered.
Figure 16.1 presents a flow diagram of the questions that need to be answered in order to complete an impact study. Relevant information from indigenous peoples on infrastructure is given in Chapter 3.
Comments
There are no comments.