Agriculture:Livestock Management
The Biogas Energy Project at U.C. Davis, which converts food scraps from the campus and San Francisco into gases for fuel.Photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kqedquest/ / CC BY-NC 2.0
Published: December 16, 2010, 12:00 am
Updated: May 7, 2012, 6:36 pm
This article has been reviewed by the following Topic Editor:
Margaret Swisher
Domestic animals kept in pens produce massive mounds of manure that become anaerobic and generate CH4 and N2O. This source amounts to 1.0% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions from human activities (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2006a). Composting, which regularly turns over manure and other organic material to promote aeration and the faster decomposition of aerobic respiration, diminishes the emissions of CH4 and other putrid products, which are generated during anaerobic respiration.
Alternatively, farmers cover the manure and other organic material to induce anaerobic conditions and capture the CH4 thus generated for use as a fuel. In Europe during 2006, such operations produced “biogas” equivalent to 1.3 million metric tons of oil (EurObserv'ER 2007), or about 0.5% of oil production from Western Europe (BP 2007). Some domestic animals — specifically, cows, sheep, goats, buffalos, and camels — have a rumen, a compartment in their digestive system that harbors microorganisms that help break down organic carbon compounds such as cellulose, which are difficult to degrade. About 3% of these microorganisms conduct methanogenesis.
Ruminants exhale the CH4 generated through this enteric fermentation, and it accounts for 4.4% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2006a). Thus, four times more greenhouse gases emanate from the mouths of ruminants than from the other end. A variety of mitigation options for livestock management are under investigation. [1] The CH4 from enteric fermentation represents a loss of carbon from the feed and, therefore, a loss of productivity. Methane emissions per animal product are higher when the diet is poor. Less fiber and more oils or organic acids decrease CH4 emissions per milk produced or weight gain, but such diets may be prohibitively expensive. Hormone treatments such as bovine somatotropin (bST) and growth hormone do not directly influence enteric fermentation, but they boost animal performance and thus reduce CH4 emissions per milk produced or weight gain. Another possibility is to administer antibiotics or vaccines that repress methanogenic microorganisms. Yet, broader use of hormones or antibiotics in domestic animals invokes health and environmental concerns.
This is an excerpt from the book Global Climate Change: Convergence of Disciplines by Dr. Arnold J. Bloom and taken from UCVerse of the University of California.
©2010 Sinauer Associates and UC Regents
Are you absolutely sure you want to delete this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Delete This Article
Are you absolutely sure you want to remove this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Remove This Article
Citation
Arnold J Bloom (Lead Author);Margaret Swisher (Topic Editor) "Livestock Management". In: Encyclopedia of Earth. Eds. Cutler J. Cleveland (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment). [First published in the Encyclopedia of Earth December 16, 2010; Last revised Date May 7, 2012; Retrieved June 18, 2013 <http://www.eoearth.org/article/Livestock_Management?topic=54486>
The Author
Arnold J. Bloom became a botanist through a circuitous route. Upon receiving an undergraduate degree in Physics from Yale University, he spent several years developing computer models of the spread of air pollution over cities in the USA and Germany. He received a Ph.D. in Biological Sciences from Stanford University, where he also completed a two-semester course in Environmental Legislation at the Law School. He conducted postdoctoral research on the temperature responses of plants at the ... (Full Bio)

Domestic animals kept in pens produce massive mounds of manure that become anaerobic and generate CH4 and N2O. This source amounts to 1.0% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions from human activities (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2006a). Composting, which regularly turns over manure and other organic material to promote aeration and the faster decomposition of aerobic respiration, diminishes the emissions of CH4 and other putrid products, which are generated during anaerobic respiration.
Alternatively, farmers cover the manure and other organic material to induce anaerobic conditions and capture the CH4 thus generated for use as a fuel. In Europe during 2006, such operations produced “biogas” equivalent to 1.3 million metric tons of oil (EurObserv'ER 2007), or about 0.5% of oil production from Western Europe (BP 2007). Some domestic animals — specifically, cows, sheep, goats, buffalos, and camels — have a rumen, a compartment in their digestive system that harbors microorganisms that help break down organic carbon compounds such as cellulose, which are difficult to degrade. About 3% of these microorganisms conduct methanogenesis.
Ruminants exhale the CH4 generated through this enteric fermentation, and it accounts for 4.4% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2006a). Thus, four times more greenhouse gases emanate from the mouths of ruminants than from the other end. A variety of mitigation options for livestock management are under investigation. [1] The CH4 from enteric fermentation represents a loss of carbon from the feed and, therefore, a loss of productivity. Methane emissions per animal product are higher when the diet is poor. Less fiber and more oils or organic acids decrease CH4 emissions per milk produced or weight gain, but such diets may be prohibitively expensive. Hormone treatments such as bovine somatotropin (bST) and growth hormone do not directly influence enteric fermentation, but they boost animal performance and thus reduce CH4 emissions per milk produced or weight gain. Another possibility is to administer antibiotics or vaccines that repress methanogenic microorganisms. Yet, broader use of hormones or antibiotics in domestic animals invokes health and environmental concerns.
This is an excerpt from the book Global Climate Change: Convergence of Disciplines by Dr. Arnold J. Bloom and taken from UCVerse of the University of California.
©2010 Sinauer Associates and UC Regents
Are you absolutely sure you want to delete this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Delete This Article
Are you absolutely sure you want to remove this article? This process cannot be undone and is permanent.
Yes, Remove This Article
1 Comment
Add CommentEileen Martinez wrote:
I had no idea that my cows were emitting so much CH4. We are raising grass-fed Jersey steer and I absolutely compost their manure (as well as that of my poultry) for use in our organic garden. I'm glad I can do something positive on that end of things, but I'm not so sure I can do anything about their breathing! Will diet make a difference in their respiratory emissions? Thanks! Eileen http://parkerpondfarm.com/how-to-build-a-compost-bin-for-hot-composting/