Conservation Biology

Declining grassland biodiversity

November 26, 2011, 9:54 am
Content Cover Image

Ludwig's bustard in arid grassland, Wolwedans, Namibia. @ C.Michael Hogan

caption Wildebeast grazing in an African savanna

Declining grassland biodiversity is a major ecological issue, although it has received only a small fraction of the attention given to forests or wetlands, by comparison. Healthy grassland ecosystems teem with plant and animal life. Some of the best-known, most dramatic, and unique large herbivores roam grasslands: antelopes and zebras in Africa; gazelles, goats, camels, bison, and wild horses in Eurasia; and deer in North America. Grasslands emanate the songs of birds—often birds found nowhere else. In fact, grasslands contain 11 percent of the world’s endemic bird areas--areas encompassing the range of two or more bird species that have relatively small ranges. (White et al. 2000:40). The flora of grasslands is just as rich and important as the fauna. Grasslands were the seedbeds for the ancestors of major cereal crops, including wheat, rice, rye, barley, sorghum, and millet. These ecosystems continue to provide genetic material necessary to breed cultivated varieties of cereals that are resistant to crop diseases.

But there are growing concerns about the ability of grasslands to sustain such a rich assemblage of species. Although there are no globally comprehensive measures of the condition of grassland biodiversity, restricted regional studies suggest that increasing conversion of grasslands to agricultural and urban areas, fragmentation of grasslands with roads, and invasive species are responsible for declines in biodiversity (White et al. 2000:45–47). Although relatively small areas of grasslands have been designated as "protected," to date this strategy appears insufficient to prevent grasslands globally from becoming more still, much quieter, and far simpler ecosystems—ecosystems less able to supply the game species, medicinal plants, tourism, and genetic material we routinely enjoy.

Pressures of Grassland Diversity

Globally, grasslands have been heavily modified by human activities; few large expanses of unaltered grasslands remain. Even small areas are frequently fragmented. Although forest fragmentation has been the source of recent and often heated discussions regarding the merits and drawbacks of deforestation and road building, grassland fragmentation has received relatively little attention, despite the fact that the fragmentation can be pervasive. In the United States, roads have so fragmented the Great Plains that 70% of those grasslands are in blocks less than 1000 km² in area, and none of the blocks are greater than 10,000 km² in area (White et al. 2000:47).

Trends in Grassland Biodiversity

There is a dearth of information about global trends in grassland biodiversity. However, some regional studies of bird populations suggest declines in grassland biodiversity, and evaluations of remaining large grassland mammals are not encouraging.

Grassland Bird Populations

The North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) provides population trends for a wide range of bird species in the United States and Canada. Survey data from 1966 to 1995 for 28 bird species that breed in grasslands show declines throughout most of the region (Sauer et al. 1997). In fact, grassland birds showed the most consistent declines of any group of birds monitored by this survey. Only a few small areas showed increases in breeding grassland birds. Habitat loss and increased mowing of grasslands for hay production on the breeding grounds, as well as problems along migratory routes or on the wintering grounds, may be responsible for many of the declines (Sauer et al. 1997; White et al. 2000:43).

Grassland Large Herbivores

In some parts of the world, grasslands have developed largely because browsing by wild herbivores has prevented the establishment and growth of trees. Main areas where grassland formation has been influenced by large herbivores are the savannas of Africa, steppes of Eurasia, and prairies of North America (WCMC 1992: 280).

Human activity, however, has seriously impaired populations of some of these large grassland vertebrates. The spectacular migrations of large vertebrates in the temperate grasslands and steppes of North America and Eurasia now occur only in isolated pockets--in the Daurian Steppe and Tibetan Plateau (Olson and Dinerstein 1997: 16). The large-scale migration of herbivores, such as wildebeest and zebra, across the savannas of Africa now occur over a much less extensive area in East Africa and the central Zambezian region (Olson and Dinerstein 1997: 16).

Is Grassland Biodiversity Sustainable?

It already may be too late for some grasslands to provide goods or services related to biodiversity in areas where conversions to agriculture and urbanization, as well as fragmentation and invasive species, have considerably altered grassland biodiversity.

Many research programs have identified grassland areas that still contain outstanding biodiversity, but the continued existence of these areas is not guaranteed. A challenge is to conserve the flora and fauna in protected areas such as the Centers of Plant Diversity, Endemic Bird Areas, Global 200 Ecoregions, and biologically distinctive areas. Protected areas (designated by IUCN--The World Conservation Union) with sizeable amounts of grassland make up only 3 percent of the global land area, or 7.6 percent of the world’s total grassland area (White et al. 2000:43). Some of these areas may be more vulnerable than others and require extra attention. For example, Centers of Plant Diversity in Madagascar are subject to clearing for agriculture, grazing, mining, erosion, and invasive exotic species (Davis et al 1994: 271). Supporting grassland biodiversity in these protected areas may require tailored, targeted protection, monitoring, and maintenance activities.

Another priority is the collection of better global information and data on grassland biodiversity. Some indicators available to evaluate grassland condition rely on subjective data rather than on quantitative measures. Just identifying and mapping large, intact grasslands is difficult because there is no consistent, up-to-date road data for the world.

Grassland biodiversity protection would benefit from the universal adoption of quantitative indicators of grassland condition, as well as regularly collected, reliable data. Such a global effort might be modeled after some regional data-gathering efforts like the Breeding Bird Survey for North America, which provides high-quality information on species abundance and population trends. These survey data permit evaluation of long-term trends across several habitats. Other datasets on grassland wildlife populations are of good quality but have limited coverage.

Datasets on invasive species must be expanded to cover the entire globe and must distinguish between introduced species and harmful species. Several workshops have addressed invasive species as an international problem, and databases related to the study and documentation of such species have been reviewed (Ridgway et al. 1999; Ricciardi et al. 2000). The National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) website provides information on these databases. Ricciardi et al. (2000: 240) call for a global information system for invasive species and provide a list of invasive species databases available on the Internet.

References and Further Reading

1. Andren, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat. Oikos 71: 355–66.

2. Davis, S.D., V.H. Heywood, and A.C. Hamilton. 1994. Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for their Conservation, Vol. 1. IUCN-World Conservation Union and World Wildlife Fund.

3. ESRI. 1993. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Digital Chart of the World CD-ROM. Redlands, CA: ESRI.

4. Franklin, I.R. 1986. Evolutionary change in small populations. In Conservation Biology, ed. M.E. Soule and B.A. Wilcox, 135–150. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

5. GLCCD. 1998. Global Land Cover Characteristics Database, Version 1.2. Data available online at: See also Loveland, T.R., B.C. Reed, J.F. Brown, D.O. Ohlen, Z. Zhu, L. Yang, J. Merchant. 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1–km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21[6-7]: 1303–1330.

6. Johnson, D.H., and S.A. Temple. 1990. Nest predation and brood parasitism of tallgrass prairie birds. Journal of Wildlife Management 54: 106–11.

7. Olson, D.M. and E. Dinerstein, E. 1997. The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Distinctive Ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund, draft manuscript. 176pp.

8. Ricciardi, A., W.W.M. Steiner, R.N. Mack, and D. Simberloff. 2000. Toward a global information system for invasive species. BioScience 50(3): 239–244.

9. Ricketts, T., E. Dinerstein, D. Olson, C. Loucks, W. Eichbaum, K. Kavanagh, P. Hedao, P. Hurley, K. Carney, R. Abell, and S. Walters. 1997. A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America Volume I: The United States and Canada. World Wildlife Fund – United States and World Wildlife Fund Canada. Prepublication Draft. 547pp.

10. Ridgeway;, R.L., W.P. Gregg, R.E. Stinner, and A.G. Brown, eds. 1999. Invasive Species Database: Proceedings of a Workshop. In collaboration with the U.S. Dept. of Interior, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, and U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Maryland: C.V. Riley Memorial Foundation. 50pp.

11. Risser, P.G. 1996. A new framework for prairie conservation. In Prairie Conservation: Preserving North America’s Most Endangered Ecosystem, ed. F.B. Samson and F.L. Knopf, 261–274. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. 339pp.

12. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, I. Thomas, J. Fallon, and G. Gough. 1999. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–1998. Version 98.1, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. (Available online at:

13. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, G. Gough, I. Thomas, and B.G. Perterjohn. 1997. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.3. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. (Available online at: htmgu/grass.html)

14. Stattersfield, A.J., M.J. Crosby, A.J. Long, and D.C. Wege. 1998. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. Birdlife Conservation Series No. 7. Cambridge: Birdlife International. 846pp.

15. WCMC. 1992. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Grasslands. In Global Biodiversity, 280–92. London: Chapman and Hall.

16. Wege, D.C. and A.J. Long. 1995. Key Areas for Threatened Birds in the Neotropics. Birdlife International. 311pp.

17. White, R.P., Murray, S., Rohweder, M. 2000. Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems: Grassland Ecosystems. World Resources Institute. 89pp.

18. WWF–US. 1999. World Wildlife Fund. Ecoregions Database. Washington, DC: WWF-US. Unpublished database.



Institute, W. (2011). Declining grassland biodiversity. Retrieved from


To add a comment, please Log In.