Scented Products and VOCs
A single fragrance in a product can contain a mixture of hundreds of chemicals, some of which react with ozone in ambient air to form dangerous secondary pollutants.This article, written by Carol Potera*, appeared first in Environmental Health Perspectives—the peer-reviewed, open access journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
The article is a verbatim version of the original and is not available for edits or additions by Encyclopedia of Earth editors or authors. Companion articles on the same topic that are editable may exist within the Encyclopedia of Earth.
Contents
Scented Products Emit a Bouquet of VOCs
A survey of selected scented consumer goods showed the products emitted more than 100 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including some that are classified as toxic or hazardous by federal laws.1 Even products advertised as “green,” “natural,” or “organic” emitted as many hazardous chemicals as standard ones.
|
File:FetchObject.actionFragrance Figures1 133 unique VOCs identified among 25 products 24 of these are classified as toxic or hazardous under at least one federal law Only 1 of the 133 was listed on any label Only 2 of the 133 were listed on any MSDS |
1[Click to preview this Correction note] Anne Steinemann, a professor of civil and environmental engineering and public affairs at the University of Washington, Seattle, and colleagues used gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to analyze VOCs given off by the products. They tested 25 air fresheners, laundry detergents, fabric softeners, dryer sheets, disinfectants, dish detergents, all-purpose cleaners, soaps, hand sanitizers, lotions, deodorants, and shampoos.1 Many of the products tested are top sellers in their category.
A single fragrance in a product can contain a mixture of hundreds of chemicals, some of which (e.g., limonene, a citrus scent) react with ozone in ambient air to form dangerous secondary pollutants, including formaldehyde.2 The researchers detected 133 different VOCs. Most commonly detected were limonene, α- and β-pinene (pine scents), ethanol, and acetone.1 The latter two chemicals are often used as carriers for fragrance chemicals.3,4
Steinemann and colleagues found the average number of VOCs emitted was 17.1 Each product emitted 1–8 toxic or hazardous chemicals, and close to half (44%) generated at least 1 of 4 carcinogenic hazardous air pollutants (acetaldehyde, 1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde, and methylene chloride).1 These hazardous air pollutants have no safe exposure level, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.5 Of the 133 VOCs detected, only ethanol was listed on any label (for 2 products), and only ethanol and 2-butoxyethanol were listed on any Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS; for 5 products and 1 product, respectively).1
Manufacturers are required by the Food and Drug Administration (which regulates personal care items) to list the term “fragrance” on product labels, but not MSDSs, although they do not need to disclose the ingredients of those fragrances.6 Manufacturers are not required by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (which regulates cleaning supplies, air fresheners, and laundry products) to list either the term “fragrance” or fragrance ingredients on labels or MSDSs.7 The Household Product Labeling Act, currently under review in the U.S. Senate, would require manufacturers to label consumer products with all ingredients, including fragrance mixtures.8 “Disclosing all ingredients could be a first step to understanding potential toxicity and health effects,” says Steinemann.
Although the authors did not seek to assess whether use of any of the products studied would be associated with any risk,1 Steinemann says she receives hundreds of letters, phone calls, and e-mails from people who report a variety of respiratory, dermatologic, and neurologic problems they attribute to scented products9: “Children have seizures after exposure to dryer sheets, and adults pass out around air fresheners,” she says. Steinemann and colleague Stanley M. Caress have written elsewhere that 19% of respondents across two U.S. telephone surveys reported health problems they attributed to air fresheners, and nearly 11% reported irritation they attributed to scented laundry products vented outdoors.10
“It’s important to take people’s complaints seriously,” says Steinemann, because “these human experiences are helping to inform science.” One of her next projects will focus on biomarkers of exposure and effect to better understand how fragranced products may cause a range of adverse health effects. “The ultimate goal is to improve public health,” Steinemann says. For now, she recommends cleaning with basic supplies like vinegar and baking soda.
Steinemann’s study “strongly suggests that we need to find unscented alternatives for cleaning our homes, laundry, and ourselves,” says Claudia Miller, an allergist and immunologist at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. An expert in chemical sensitivity, or toxicant-induced loss of tolerance, Miller created the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory,11 a screening tool for chemical intolerance. According to Miller, products intended to keep homes smelling fresh can set people up for a lifetime of chemically induced illness, and repeated exposure to small amounts of household chemicals can trigger symptoms to previously tolerated chemicals.12 “The best smell is no smell,” Miller says.
References
1. Fragranced consumer products: chemicals emitted, ingredients unlisted. Environ Impact Assess Rev. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.08.002 Find this article online
2. Nazaroff WW, Weschler CJ. Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants. Atmos Environ 38(18):2841–2865 (2004); doi:10.1016/?j.atmosenv.2004.02.040.
3. Application data: ethanol for the personal care industry. Houston, TX:Lyondell Chemical Company (2004). Available: http://tinyurl.com/2axnrhg 5 January 2011.
4. What’s Inside: Ingredients A–Z [website]. Racine, WI:SC Johnson & Son, Inc. Available: http://tinyurl.com/39cmdnd 5 January 2011.
5. EPA. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, EPA/630/P-03/001F. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Available: http://tinyurl.com/2cu4qzv 8 Dec 2010.
6. FDA. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 701. Cosmetic Labeling, §701.2–§701.9. Washington, DC:U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2001). Available: http://tinyurl.com/3224kko 8 Dec 2010.
7. Consumer Product Safety Act, Public Law 92-573, 86 Stat. 1207 (1972). Available: http://tinyurl.com/32b4duc 8 Dec 2010.
8. Govtrack.us [database]. Household Product Labeling Act of 2009, S. 1697. Washington, DC:Civic Impulse, LLC. Available: http://tinyurl.com/yb5nkbv 8 Dec 2010.
9. Exposure Assessment, Feedback from the Public [website]. Seattle, WA:University of Washington, College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Available: http://tinyurl.com/2uh9gan 8 Dec 2010.
10. Prevalence of fragrance sensitivity in the American population. J Environ Health 71(7):46–50. 2009. Find this article online
11. The Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (EESI): a standardized approach for measuring chemical intolerances for research and clinical applications. Toxicol Ind Health 15(3–4):370–385. 1999. doi:10.1177/074823379901500311 Find this article online
12. The compelling anomaly of chemical intolerance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 933:1–23. 2001. PMID:12000012. Find this article online
Editor's Notes
- *Carol Potera, based in Montana, has written for EHP since 1996. She also writes for Microbe, Genetic Engineering News, and the American Journal of Nursing.
- Citation: Potera C 2011. Scented Products Emit a Bouquet of VOCs. Environ Health Perspect 119:a16-a16. doi:10.1289/ehp.119-a16
- Online: 01 January 2011
- See: Synthetic Musks in the Encyclopedia of Earth.
- Also, see: Long-lasting chemicals threaten the environment and human health.
- The original article has been corrected here and in the originating journal: "The January news article “Scented Products Emit a Bouquet of VOCs” Health Perspect 119:A16 (2011) incorrectly stated that 24 carcinogenic hazardous air pollutants were detected by Steinemann et al. and that manufacturers are not required by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations to disclose fragrances on personal care item labels. Steinemann et al. actually detected 4 carcinogenic hazardous air pollutants, and manufacturers are required under FDA regulation to list the term “fragrance” on personal care item labels, although they need not disclose the ingredients of those fragrances, nor must the term “fragrance” or fragrance ingredients be disclosed on Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs). Under Consumer Product Safety Commission regulations, neither the term “fragrance” nor fragrance ingredients are required to be disclosed on product labels or MSDSs. The news article also incorrectly implied that Steinemann et al. were the source for the statement that ethanol and acetone are often used as carriers for fragrance chemicals. The sources for this statement are actually Lyondell Chemical Company and SC Johnson & Son, Inc.The HTML version has been corrected.".
.
1 Comment
Ellis Brett wrote: 01-27-2012 00:53:56
Oh yes off-course we need to preserve this fragrance so that it cannot be polluted. But it's a very major step how this could be possible. pass a hair drug test